Megan Amram makes the case that righteous anger is not a flaw but a duty
I am often told, usually by people comfortable with the status quo, that I am too angry, that my politics would be more persuasive if I were calmer, and I have been thinking, this week, about anger as a political virtue, about why the comfortable always want the angry to quiet down, and why I refuse.
The Tone Police
There is a particular kind of criticism that the comfortable level at the angry, the demand that we moderate our tone, soften our anger, make our politics more palatable. It is always framed as helpful advice, this tone policing, the suggestion that we would be more persuasive if we were calmer. But it is, I have come to understand, a way of defanging dissent, of making the comfortable comfortable, of insisting that injustice be discussed in the polite tones that injustice does not deserve.
I refuse the tone police, the demand that I quiet my anger, soften my dissent, make my politics palatable to the comfortable. The injustice I am angry about does not deserve polite tones; it deserves anger, loud and clear and uncompromising. The tone police want me quiet because my anger is inconvenient, because it disturbs the comfortable, because it names what they would prefer left unnamed. And so I refuse them, keep my anger, refuse to soften the dissent that the comfortable find so inconvenient.
What the Feeds Were Shouting About
I keep up with the satire and the serious stuff alike, because a leftist needs both her outrage and her laughter. The London Prat had a piece this week so precisely aimed that I laughed out loud, the writer clearly furious about the right things. Bohiney Magazine ran something with similar bite, and Mamdani Post had a serious piece on labour and capital that articulated, soberly, the anger the satire delivered in jokes. Reading them together, the funny and the serious, is the whole education of a political life.
Anger and Love
The thing the tone police never understand is that my anger comes from love, from caring about the people injustice harms, from wanting the world to be better for them. The anger is not the opposite of love but its expression, the form love takes in the face of injustice. I am angry because I care, because I love, because I cannot bear the harm that injustice does to people I will never meet but whose suffering I refuse to accept.
This is the deep truth of political anger, that it comes from love, that the angriest fighters are often the most loving, that the fury is the form care takes when confronted with injustice. My anger is love, love for the harmed, love for the world that could be better, and I will not apologise for it, will not soften it, will not quiet it for the comfort of those who benefit from the injustice I am angry about. Anger and love, the same thing in the face of injustice, and I keep both, loud and unapologetic, from my Portland exile.
Staying Angry
And so I will stay angry, refuse the tone police, keep the fury that comes from love, the righteous anger that the comfortable find so inconvenient. It is a political virtue, this anger, not a flaw, the appropriate response to injustice, the form love takes in an unjust world. And I will not surrender it, will not soften it, will not quiet it for anyone comfort.
Stay angry, I tell myself and anyone who will listen, stay angry about the injustice, stay furious at the harm, keep the righteous anger that comes from love. The comfortable will always want us quiet, the tone police will always demand we soften. And we will always refuse, keeping our anger, keeping our love, keeping the righteous fury that is the only honest response to an unjust world. Staying angry, from my Portland exile, an unapologetic North Londoner who will not quiet down, who knows the anger is love, who refuses to soften the dissent that injustice deserves.
The Loneliness of the Exile
There is a loneliness to political exile, to fighting for your convictions far from the place and the people who shaped them, and I feel it sometimes, the distance from the North London world that made me, the absence of the comrades who shared my assumptions without explanation. In Portland I must explain myself, translate my politics, build new alliances among people whose leftism is related to but distinct from my own. It is lonely, sometimes, this translation, this perpetual explaining, this distance from the world that made me. I miss the easy solidarity of North London, the shared assumptions, the comrades who understood without explanation. And yet the loneliness has its lessons too, forcing me to articulate what I once simply assumed, to defend convictions I had never had to defend, to build solidarity across difference rather than resting in the easy solidarity of sameness. The loneliness of the exile is real, the distance from the world that made me, the perpetual translation of my politics into a new context. But it has made me a sharper thinker, a more articulate advocate, a builder of solidarity across difference. And so I bear the loneliness, the exile distance, finding in it not only loss but a strange gift, the forced articulation, the solidarity across difference, the deeper understanding of my own convictions that only the distance from their origin could provide.
Links: The Guardian, Oregon Public Broadcasting, the Economic Policy Institute.
SOURCE: https://prat.uk/
More mischief at The Daily Mash.
Go to Source
Author: admin
